April 28 was the club meeting and game day we held at the Virginia War Museum.
There was a room full of gamers there for the ODMS meeting in the morning (10:00am), but by Noon, the number had grown, as we added a few more gamers for a game day.
The games played were two, primarily - Heroes of Normandie, and Hail Caesar. I was the referee for the Hail Caesar game, so here is the description. There were six players, three on each side. The Carthaginian side featured Rich (of CMS), a friend of his (Brian I think), and Justin as overall commander. The Iberian side featured Richard, Stephen as overall commander, and David as the commander of the Gallic mercenaries.
History
The Carthaginians, during the period following the First Punic War, whence their fortunes were somewhat reduced, were led by the Barca clan to believe that new fortunes could be made by having a reinforced trade colony in Iberia. Much of that effort was the various ports and colonies on the eastern coast of the Peninsula (Carthago Nova, for instance), but also the Phoenician bad boys wanted to push in country. This led them to a conflict with the Oretani tribes.
The Phoenicians had established the city of Tartessos at the mouth of the Baetis river, and now they had moved up the river, and constructed an inland port. Raids by the local Oretani (a mix of Iberian, Celtic, and of course, Celtiberian) warbands made the area unsafe, so the Army was called in. They moved in from the eastern coast, and began the ponderous job of crossing the river, to pacify the Oretani.
At that time, the Oretani tribes, alerted to the river crossing, struck! They came down out of the hills and attacked the Carthaginians during their weakest moment, with half the army on each side of the river.
Scenario
In the game, the Carthaginians had four divisions of troops, two on each side of the river. There was only one permanent (stonework) bridge that had been constructed for the colony, it could accommodate 1 unit of troops, per turn, crossing it. Each division of troops has 4-5 units in it, so that is a nightmare. Luckily, the Carthaginians had some engineers along, and were able to construct a hasty pontoon style bridge, to double their crossing capability.
Along the river, there were several mooring spots near the colony. The Carthaginians had shipborn reinforcements (a fifth division of troops, very heavy, with 8 units). But it would take turns to sail to the mooring spots nearest the action. In addition, the Carthaginian players decided to build the pontoon bridge in such a way, that it masked one of the mooring spots (making it inaccessible).
So the pregame decision of the Cartho players was - where to place your pontoon bridge. Too far up stream, and you lose tactical capability to relieve pressure on the main point of action. But too far down stream, and you block potential landing areas for reinforcements.
The Iberians, on the other hand, had their own pregame decision. They had a chest full of Lusitanian silver (as well as some Lusitanian soldiers who joined the cause). With that silver, they could (1) hire Cilician pirates to attack the Carthaginian reinforcements (and attempt to sink some of them), or (2) hire Gallic Mercenaries. The Iberian commander chose the second course of action.
The game was a disaster from the outset for the Carthaginian players. They were not making their command rolls well, and they were commanded by all newbie players. The Iberians had a couple of ancients players on their side. Plus they were making very good command rolls, ensuring good moves (at least in the earliest turns). Also, the scenario very harshly punished the Carthaginians. In hindsight, I think I would have (1) made the landing points for the reinforcements more flexible, and (2) allowed more units to cross the bridges each turn. But the scenario was to be the Barbarians catching a stronger Imperial power, while they were in the act of crossing a bridge. That succeeded, but it could not have been much fun for the Carthaginians. In spite of that, however, the Cartho players did seem to have a really good time, and they even had some great tactical successes. Until the horde of Gauls descended on them - that proved to be too much, and it was time to call it a game.
In the meantime, it did encourage me to finish painting the Old Glory buildings used in the game, and to scratch build the pontoon bridge and the mooring spots (piers). Including "Fisherman's Wharf" - shown here with the infamous Iberian Koi.
Sunday, April 29, 2018
Saturday, April 21, 2018
DBA and Hail Caesar - AAR April 19 2018
This week, the club had its weekly gaming night at World's Best Comics. There were a couple of Ancients games being played.
First was a DBA game between Dave and Stephen. (details to follow)
Second was a Hail Caesar game between Stephen and Chuck (playing Gauls) and Dave and James (playing Marian Romans).
The Hail Caesar game had 400 point armies on both sides.
The Marian Roman army list consisted of:
3x units of Legionaires
3x units of Veteran Legionaires (Caesar's 10th?)
3x units of "Spanish" style light Legionaires
2x units of Germanic medium cavalry
1x unit of Numidian light cavalry
2x units of Roman skirmishers (small units, with javelin)
3x division commanders (1 was commander in chief)
The Gallic army list consisted of:
1x unit of Gaesatae (naked fanatics)
1x unit of General's bodyguard (cool, professional soldiers)
7x units of Warband (large units, with javelin and sword)
2x units of medium cavalry
1x unit of light cavalry
2x units of skirmishers (small units, with sling)
3x division commanders (1 was commander in chief)
The game progressed pretty well, with three divisions on each side (roughly four units per division, not counting the skirmishers). The Roman's (albeit in a pretty good position) finally lost the battle when the second of their divisions breaking.
Some interesting effects of the game system's command and control system - the Gallic cavalry, on the right flank, did not want to activate the first two turns of the game, which almost left the right flank of the army open to a unit of German cavalry, supported by the mounted Numidians.
The Roman legionaire units all began the game in testudo formation, and that combined with their training, meant they could execute a move every turn, regardless of their command and control dice results.
The game was a learning one for most of us, and we got a few things wrong as we work through the rules, but we planned to try it again in a few weeks, the basic rules being pretty enjoyable, and offering up some interesting tactical solutions (like unit support in combat, interesting flank move possibilities, and lots of great army lists and unit types).
First was a DBA game between Dave and Stephen. (details to follow)
Second was a Hail Caesar game between Stephen and Chuck (playing Gauls) and Dave and James (playing Marian Romans).
Gauls taunting their Roman foes |
The Hail Caesar game had 400 point armies on both sides.
Hot action! Gallic Infantry, ferocious charge against Roman line! |
The Marian Roman army list consisted of:
3x units of Legionaires
3x units of Veteran Legionaires (Caesar's 10th?)
3x units of "Spanish" style light Legionaires
2x units of Germanic medium cavalry
1x unit of Numidian light cavalry
2x units of Roman skirmishers (small units, with javelin)
3x division commanders (1 was commander in chief)
The Gallic army list consisted of:
1x unit of Gaesatae (naked fanatics)
1x unit of General's bodyguard (cool, professional soldiers)
7x units of Warband (large units, with javelin and sword)
2x units of medium cavalry
1x unit of light cavalry
2x units of skirmishers (small units, with sling)
3x division commanders (1 was commander in chief)
Gaesatae (from behind) Ready to throw themselves on the Romans! |
Gaul line meets Roman line (Gallic division commander riding in a chariot) |
Gauls approaching the Roman testudo formations! |
The Roman legionaire units all began the game in testudo formation, and that combined with their training, meant they could execute a move every turn, regardless of their command and control dice results.
Gallic second line advances (ignore the Persian styling on the C-in-C chariot) |
The game was a learning one for most of us, and we got a few things wrong as we work through the rules, but we planned to try it again in a few weeks, the basic rules being pretty enjoyable, and offering up some interesting tactical solutions (like unit support in combat, interesting flank move possibilities, and lots of great army lists and unit types).
Maybe this'll happen next time, Romans |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)